Latest Swing State Polls: Obama Expanding the Map

cross-posted at Election Inspection

Swing State Polls, below the flip, divided into 3 catgories:

Defense: States Kerry won (CT, MI, MN, NH, NJ, OR, PA, WI)

Red-to-Blue: States Kerry lost where Obama is winning or tied (CO, IA, MO, NM, OH, VA)

Frontiers: States where Obama is close behind McCain (AK, GA, FL, MS, NV, NC, ND)

The summary: Obama 317, McCain 221 if Obama wins Ohio; Obama 297, McCain 241 if Obama loses Ohio.

Defense: States that John Kerry won

StatePollObamaMcCainKerryBush
ConnecticutRasmussen 5/2947445444
MichiganRasmussen 6/945425148
MinnesotaSUSA 6/13-6/1647465148
New HampshireRasmussen 6/1850395049
New JerseyQuinnipiac 6/5-6/845395346
OregonSUSA 6/17-6/1948455248
PennsylvaniaQuinnipiac 6/9-6/1652405149
WisconsinSUSA 6/13-6/1652435049

OK, let's tackle that SUSA Minnesota poll. The crosstabs show Obama and McCain tied among voters aged 18-34. That is just patently ridiculous. We'll just have to go back to the 6/11 Rasmussen poll which showed Obama leading by 13. Obama will likely win Minnesota by double digits.

The Oregon poll is weird too, also showing the race far closer than any other poll has. In that one, SUSA didn't even bother to show crosstabs by age, and after the Minnesota poll, that casts this poll very heavily into suspicion as well. The 6/11 Rasmussen poll from Oregon has Obama up by 8, which is very much in line with other polls done here.

SUSA's Wisconsin poll predictably showed Obama's strength with 18-34 voters, and also won every other age group. Too good to be true? Well, it falls in line with the U. of Wisconsin poll (6/8-6/10), although I find fault with the question order there. Even so, two consecutive polls in agreement suggest that Obama is doing quite well in Wisconsin.

The polls appear to suggest that McCain is doing well in Connecticut and New Jersey. No matter what the polls say, these states are highly unlikely to flip to the GOP. New Jersey in particular is infamous for seeing Democrats outperform the polls. And Connecticut, where civil unions are legal? That poll was taken before Hillary endorsed Obama - just forget it.

ARG and Rasmussen both released New Hampshire polls last week, and both show Obama winning by double digits. And that was supposed to be McCain's best chance at turning a blue state red. Pennsylvania looks good according to Quinnipiac, but Rasmussen will release a new poll there at 5:00 PM EDT today and I expect they'll show a closer margin, just as they did in Ohio and Florida (see below).

Red-to-Blue: States that John Kerry lost where Obama is leading or tied

StatePollObamaMcCainKerryBush
ColoradoRasmussen 6/1743414752
IowaSUSA 6/13-6/1649454950
MissouriRasmussen 6/343424653
New MexicoRasmussen 6/1847394950
OhioRasmussen 6/1743444951
VirginiaRasmussen 6/1245444851

I include Ohio here as "tied" because Quinnipiac and PPP released polls last week showing Obama up by 48/42 and 50/39 respectively. PPP, however, is a Democratic firm. Then again, one could make a case for Rasmussen being GOP-leaning, but they are officially non-partisan whereas PPP is officially partisan. Rasmussen had a very good track record for the 2004 presidential election, in any case, though that doesn't guarantee that they are operating without bias.

The Iowa poll seems surprisingly close. One has to wonder how accurate it could be considering it was conducted in the middle of severe flooding. Today's Rasmussen poll in New Mexico, not surprisingly, shows a nice Unity bump for Obama compared to last month's tied SUSA poll. Expect people who claimed that Latinos were racist and wouldn't vote for a black candidate to end up looking very very stupid.

Rasmussen's Virginia poll is confirmed by a PPP poll showing a 2 point lead for Obama. Meanwhile, there's nothing to compare Rasmussen's Colorado polls to, since no nonpartisan firm has polled this critical swing state since February's 50-state SUSA poll. I have no idea why that is, or whether or not the race in Colorado really is getting closer the way Rasmussen shows, but SUSA will be doing another round of 50-state polling within the next week or so, I'm told.

Frontiers: States where Obama is close behind McCain

StatePollObamaMcCainKerryBush
AlaskaRasmussen 6/1641453661
GeorgiaInsiderAdvantage 6/1943444158
FloridaRasmussen 6/1839474752
MississippiRasmussen 5/2744504060
NevadaRasmussen 6/1842454851
North CarolinaRasmussen 6/1043454456
North DakotaDakota Wesleyan U. 3/24-4/338443663

All right, Georgia's newly added to this list, but don't get the vapors; we're talking about InsiderAdvantage here. They've been amazingly inaccurate in pretty much every Southern state this cycle. Don't believe them until another poll confirms it. Likewise, I'd ignore the very outdated North Dakota poll.

Also newly added is Alaska. Rasmussen's poll shows McCain's lead being cut in half since last month. Obama is advertising there, now. In a state as small and as usually forgotten as Alaska, showing up at all can have a big impact.

The Florida polls have been just as wacky as the Ohio ones. Quinnipiac and ARG both released polls last week showing Obama leading, by 47/43 and 49/44 respectively. Of course, ARG polls are even crappier than InsiderAdvantage. So if you average Rasmussen and Quinnipiac, you get a slight lead for McCain here, which would be my expectation.

Rasmussen's Nevada poll shows a 3-point McCain lead, confirming the Mason-Dixon poll from the prior week showing a 2 point gap. And the North Carolina poll's 2-point margin is corroborated by a GOP partisan Civitas poll  showing McCain up by 4. My policy is to display on these posts the most recent nonpartisan poll.

If McCain wins Ohio, the Electoral Vote tally stands at Obama 297, McCain 241. If Obama wins Ohio, the count remains at Obama 317, McCain 221 as it was last week.


Poll
Which of these states will Obama win? (check all that apply)
Iowa
New Mexico
Colorado
Virginia
Ohio
Missouri
Florida
Nevada
Alaska
North Carolina

Votes: 29
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Obama Expanding the Map (2.00 / 1)

Rasmussen seems to really like releasing polls a day after other pollsters do. Today's Utah poll comes a day after Dan Jones & Associates released theirs. What are the odds?


Visit Election Inspection for analysis, polls, and predictions!
by X Stryker on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 02:06:14 PM EST

Man (none / 0)

I hate good news this early, makes me think, "Ok, so what are the Republican's gonna pull next to try and slander him down?"

Guess I have an unhealthy amount of pessimism, because these polls are looking really good.  Stretching the map out a bit to make the republicans spend in states they thought they had can put a lot of pressure on them.  It's nice being on the offensive.


by libertyleft on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 02:13:13 PM EST

One thing that bothers me... (none / 0)

I would love to know where Kerry was in the polls in "his" states at this time in the last cycle.

I worry that undecideds in this unusual election may tend to flip to McCain, and there seems to be a large number of them.  Did either candidate poll closer to 50% in the states they ended up winning last time, at this point in the campaign?

Potential ceilings on voters always is a concern.

Oh..and donate please.


by mady on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 02:18:20 PM EST

Connecticut? (2.00 / 1)

Odd that the margin is so close there, but again very consistent with what we've seen out of Massachusetts this cycle.  Fascinating that Pennsylvania is polling more blue than New Jersey, Oregon, Minnesota, CT, Mass, etc.


2004 swing state margins: PA-2%, OH-2%, IA-1%, WI-0.5%, MI-3%, FL-5%, NM-1%; Alienating 50% of the party is a luxury we can't afford.
by BPK80 on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 02:34:52 PM EST

Obama Expanding the Map (2.00 / 1)

Massachusetts is polling very blue. Most recent poll (by Suffolk) has Obama up by 23. Of course, SUSA had a mid-May RV poll with Obama only up by 5, but they mysteriously didn't break the crosstabs down by age. SUSA's polls in which VP choices are discussed have been of mediore quality, IMO, based on the inconsistency they've shown.


Visit Election Inspection for analysis, polls, and predictions!
by X Stryker on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 02:51:21 PM EST

My guess for now (none / 0)

All Kerry states are safe for Obama

Red-to-Blue:  Obama picks up CO, IA, and VA  (+29)

Frontiers:  None.  He would have won NV with a different Republican but McCain's regional strength will help him.

Kerry lost by 34 EVs, so this pick up would not be enough.  

My guess: Whoever wins 2 of 3 PA/FL/OH wins it.  Again.  Obama's got PA, OH is his better chance.  


by activatedbybush on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 03:00:02 PM EST

Re: Latest Swing State Polls: Obama Expanding the (2.00 / 2)


Looks an awful lot like the Gore map and the Kerry map.
by killjoy on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 03:28:29 PM EST

that isn't that good, (2.00 / 2)

being that he's on defense in states that have voted Democrat in the last four elections, that Kerry won. CT should not be close. Those red-to-blue states are a very shaky proposition as well. I still doubt Virginia will switch, and Missouri will be a tough nut to crack. Maybe he can get it. It was actually close even in 1988, won by Clinton twice, and close the last two elections. Obama's got to lock up the blue states already, and then go for the red ones. I think he's likely to win iowa, especially if McCain and Bush don't help them right now, New Mexico is a shot, but he's got to position himself on immigration, I think Ohio is possible. I'd bet thats where a large chunk of the money goes that he raises. I just don't see colorado. Too bad we didn't nominate Hillary. A lot more states, like West Virginia, Arkansas, Kentucky, and maybe Louisiana, which gave Clinton a 52-38 in 1996 would all be added to possible swing states along with the current ones. They love her in Florida, and she'd be more likely to win Ohio. Oh well,


by Lakrosse on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 03:36:15 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.